Jackson, 2001 OK CR 35, 38 P.3d 228 (citing Press–Enterprise Co. Woodward, 2010 OK 29, 237 P.3d 145 (citing Richmond Newspapers for importance of open judicial proceeding, but finding due process does not require that either parent have access to transcript of in camera interview of children in custody trial) Nichols v. Richmond Newspapers and the Press–Enterprise cases have been cited and applied by the Oklahoma courts in a variety of contexts.
#Courts slur seek root out clerk trial
State, 1948 OK CR 26, 192 P.2d 294 (exclusion of public from trial was prejudicial error). State, 1958 OK CR 79, 330 P.2d 734 (rejecting claim of appellant that television coverage of trial had denied him a fair trial), and Neal v. 555 (1980), the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals had recognized the presumptive openness of judicial proceedings and the functional values served by openness in Lyles v. Hall Estill Hardwick Gable Golden & NelsonĮven before Richmond Newspapers, Inc. Tips for covering courts in the jurisdiction Cameras and other technology in the courtroomĬ.
Interests often cited in opposing a presumption of accessī. Media standing to challenge third-party gag ordersĪ. Restrictions on participants in litigationĪ. Prohibitions on photographing or identifying juvenilesĮ. Juror identities, questionnaires and other recordsĭ. Warrants, wiretaps and related materialsī.
Obtaining review of initial court decisionsĭ. Procedure for requesting access in civil mattersĭ. Procedure for requesting access in criminal casesĬ.
Procedure for asserting right of access to proceedings and recordsī. Introduction: Access rights in the jurisdiction Skip over table of contents to continue reading article Table of contents for Oklahoma
0 kommentar(er)
